It has also driven the drug trade underground, where there are no legal avenues for peacefully resolving disputes between competitors. Rather than proposing specific policies for increasing prevention and treatment services to directly impact drug use in the United States, the federal government's approach to the alarming prohibition-related violence in countries like Mexico and Colombia has been to pour more money into law enforcement crackdowns on cartels and efforts to intercept drug shipments.
Throughout the drug war's history, these kinds of supply-side interventions have consistently failed to reduce violence. They have instead made the illicit drug market more profitable, more competitive and more dangerous. In countries that bear the brunt of drug war violence, such as Mexico, Bolivia and Colombia, prominent leaders are speaking up more and more about the benefits of ending prohibition.
We believe ending drug prohibition is the key to reducing drug war violence in the U. The Drug Policy Alliance is working to shift funding away from the same old failed policies and toward effective drug treatment and education programs. We advocate for ending prohibition and treating drug use as a health issue, not a criminal legal issue. As a nation, we must learn to live with the reality of drugs and drug use and find solutions based on common sense and sound economic principles.
Making Economic Sense. Here are some of the fiscal costs of the war on drugs: In , the United States had 50, people behind bars for drug law violations — now we have half a million. More than one million people are arrested simply for drug possession in the U. Money funneled into drug enforcement has meant less funding to improve public safety and has left essential education, health, social service and public safety programs struggling to operate on meager funding.
Drug war advocates continue to demand more money for the same failed policies despite the fact that highly-funded law enforcement and interdiction strategies have failed to reduce drug use and drug availability. They want to keep wasting your tax dollars and destroying countless lives on a losing battle. The drug war has created enormous public health costs by limiting the availability of harm reduction programs that could quell overdose and infectious disease transmission rates.
Distorted Incentives for Law Enforcement Ever wonder why police spend so much time enforcing failed drug laws? Peter Gordon Director, Government Affairs. Jun 27, Betsy Pearl , Maritza Perez.
Introduction President Richard Nixon called for a war on drugs in , setting in motion a tough-on-crime policy agenda that continues to produce disastrous results today. The war on drugs Every 25 seconds, someone in America is arrested for drug possession. In the first two weeks after their release from prison, individuals are almost 13 times more likely to die than the general population.
Crime rates have trended downward since , and researchers attribute 75 to percent of these reductions to factors other than incarceration. Prosecutors are twice as likely to pursue a mandatory minimum sentence for a black defendant than a white defendant charged with the same offense, 16 and black defendants are less likely to receive relief from mandatory minimums. Though whites have the highest rates of fatal opioid overdoses, fatalities are on the rise among communities of color.
During the same period, opioid deaths rose by nearly 53 percent among Latinos and 84 percent among blacks. Every month, first responders in New York City save lives by administering naloxone. After implementing syringe access services, Washington state documented an 80 percent drop in new diagnoses of hepatitis B and hepatitis C.
These facilities have proven successful in connecting individuals with treatment and social services, as well as reducing overdose fatalities and blood-borne illnesses. Over the course of two years, a safe injection site in Vancouver, British Columbia, for example, was associated with a 35 percent reduction in overdose fatalities in its immediate vicinity. In the year after establishing the facility, Vancouver saw a 30 percent increase in entry into treatment among safe injection users, compared to the year before the site opened.
These are specialized court programs that can reduce recidivism by sentencing defendants to substance use treatment, supportive services, and supervision and monitoring instead of incarceration. Fourteen years after enrolling in the program, drug court participants were 24 percent less likely to be rearrested for a drug-related offense and nearly 30 percent less likely to recidivate overall.
Successful graduation is also less common among communities of color. In some drug courts, failure rates for black participants exceed that of white participants by 30 percent or more. Since , America has spent over a trillion dollars enforcing its drug policy, according to research from the University of Pennsylvania. Yet many observers, both liberal and conservative, say the war on drugs has not paid off.
The campaign, launched by President Richard Nixon , has spanned multiple administrations and led to the creation of a dedicated federal agency, the Drug Enforcement Administration. Law enforcement was given an unprecedented level of authority with measures like mandatory sentencing and no-knock warrants, recently reevaluated after the death of Breonna Taylor , who was shot and killed by police in a botched drug raid.
Despite a steep decline in illicit drug usage in the earlier years, drug use in the U. If the goal of the war on drugs was to decrease drug usage and prevent drug-related deaths, it hasn't made much progress. In , overdose deaths in the United States exceeded 90, , compared with 70, in , according to research from the Commonwealth Fund.
Yet, the federal government is spending more money than ever to enforce drug policies. In , the federal budget for drug abuse prevention and control was just over a billion dollars.
0コメント